Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of infertile couples


Objective(s): to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertile couples’ emotions, anxiety and future plans.

Study design: An observational study was perfomed by Italian ART centers and online forums. In this study, infertile couples candidate to ART and whose treatment was blocked due to the COVID-19 lockdown were enrolled through an online survey. The psychological impact of COVID-19 was measured by Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and by a short form of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); Self-perceived anxiety related either to pregnancy safety and to economic crisis measured by VAS scale.

Results: 627 patients completed the survey. The COVID-19 lock-down had a moderate/severe psychological impact on infertile patients (mean IES-R score 36.4 ± 16.6). The mean STAI score was 49.8 ± 15.3, with an overall incidence of STAI > 36 of 71 %. The mean VAS scale for anxiety perception was 45.3 ± 15.3. Women were more emotionally distressed, anxious and depressed than men (36.8 ± 16.4 vs 31.0 ± 18.4 for IES-R, respectively; p = 0.03). Notwithstanding the uncertainty about pregnancy safety, 64.6 % of respondents chose to maintain their reproductive programme. Economic crisis induced 11.5 % of the surveyed patients to give up their ART program. Respondents who had at least one relative affected by COVID-19 had a significantly higher IES-R score and anxiety VAS, but not higher STAI scores, than patients belonging to unaffected families.

Conclusion(s): COVID-19 pandemic itself and the recommendation to stop ART program generated higher distress levels in infertile couples. The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic in infertility patients should not be underestimated, and a specific psychological support should be planned.

Keywords: Anxiety; COVID-19; Distress; Infertility; Pandemic; Psychological impact.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors report no declarations of interest.


Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Similar articles


    1. Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–733. – PMC – PubMed
    1. Huang C., Wang Y., Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. – PMC – PubMed
    1. [Internet]. Italia: Ministero della salute; c2020 [cited 2020 Apr 25]. Covid-19 – Situazione in Italia. Available from:
    1. Wang W., Xu Y., Gao R. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1843–1844. Mar 11. – PMC – PubMed
    1. Carosso A., Cosma S., Borella F. Pre-labor anorectal swab for SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients: is it time to think about it? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;249:98–99. Apr 14. – PMC – PubMed

Leave a Reply